Although this site has been produced for specific courses and groups of students it is designed as a public resource. If you find it useful then please let me know.

If you want to comment feel free to do so and if you find something wrong get in touch.

hide alert

Mobile technologies (lecture 2)

Written by: Jonathan Briggs

February 8, 2005 [7628 views]

It is easy to get mired in a sea of abbreviations and acronyms when dealing with mobile technology. What is really important is building up a mental picture of what each technology is used for and how each is suited to different types of application or environment.

Here is a good glossary of mobile terms www.gsmworld.com

What are the current options?
  • GSM/GPRS (in the UK and Europe)
  • Bluetooth
  • 802.11b (WiFi)
  • 3G/UMTS
How do you choose an appropriate technology?
  • Cost (infrastructure and running costs)
  • Distance between data source and terminals
  • Bandwidth
  • Security
  • Charging models
  • Moving terminals versus mobile terminals
Understand your terminal (mobile)
  • Radio transmitter/receiver
  • Phone module (GSM)
  • Data modules (GPRS/3G)
  • Bluetooth module (Personal Area Network)
  • SIM card
  • Operating system
  • PIM functionality(calendar, phone books, document display)
  • Data storage device
  • Camera
  • Power consumption issues – how do we make batteries last longer?
  • Spectrum compression issues – how can we squeeze greater bandwith through finite spectrum?
  • Standards issues (with other technologies in the US/Japan) – how do we build compatible but commercially competing networks?
  • Coverage – need to be able to downgrade to lower bandwidth system in rural and poor coverage areas.
    a basic tutorial on cell phones

Characteristics of different systems

GSM/GPRS
  • Global System for Mobile communication
  • 900 Mhz, 1800 Mhz and 1900 Mhz part of the spectrum allocated specifically to mobile communications
  • 1 billion+ GSM customers worldwide
  • Packet switched digital mobile network and terminals
  • Operates in 170 countries
  • Time division transmission
  • Very efficient voice compression
  • Upgradeable to GPRS (2.5G) for data, EDGE through higher compression and UMTS (3G)
    a tutorial on GSM
Network components
  • Connected cell towers (radio – specific regions of the microwave radio spectrum) – terminals and towers negotiate digital connection
  • Calls can be passed between cells (cells stretch!) as edge of footprint is reached
  • Cells have capacity limits and are affected by terrain and buildings
  • Bandwidth is expensive although the cost is falling
  • All calls are made via cells – never directly between handsets
  • Routing and switching systems
  • Interconnections with IP and Telephone Networks
  • Roaming agreements allow handsets to connect to other networks (SOS calling or internationally)
  • Cells ‘know’ which terminals they are currently talking to and through triangulation can pinpoint location
Bluetooth
  • Short-range wireless (10 metres) replacing cables
  • 720 kbps
  • 34 million Bluetooth aware devices shipped in 2002
  • Public part of the spectrum (2.4 GHz) - frequency hops to avoid interference
  • Ideal for connecting devices (keyboards, mice, headsets, speakers, phones , mp3, games consoles, in car devices etc)
  • Can be encrypted
  • Devices are “paired” before communication (eg headset to phone)
  • Low cost – Bluetooth adapter for PC/Mac costs around £30
  • Small, low energy requirement (could be built into clothing)
  • Backed by a range of IT suppliers (including Nokia, Apple, Sony, Ericsson, Microsoft, Intel)
    read more about Bluetooth at www.bluetooth.com
WiFi 802.11b/g
  • In location wireless networking
  • 11 Mbps (shared) – 54 Mbps (for Apple’s 802.11g version)
  • Wireless bridging can extend range
  • Public part of the spectrum (2.4 GHz) - multiple channels
  • Some security issues
  • Ideal for connection of mobile computers (and soon phones) in different locations
  • Low cost – base stations (£100), PC cards (£30)
  • Ideal for “road warriors” who want to work wherever they are
  • Backed by a range of IT suppliers (T-Mobile, Apple, Starbucks, BT, Intel)
  • WiFi compatible mobile phones are planned
  • Experimental roaming
  • Business model possible for access providers (Open Zone)
    more about WiFi on www.wifinetnews
    read about Apple's Airport Wifi technology

Other technologies

GPS
  • US (military) satellite positioning system
  • 24 satellites in geostationary orbit
  • Receivers measure the time taken to receive signals from three or more satellites through accurate synchronization of sending/receiving and hence distance
  • Triangulation of three signals allows distance to be calculated accurately (around 1m)
  • Requires clear line of sight although intermediate positions can be estimated
  • Does not require any communication from the receiver
  • Russia and the EU are constructing their own improved systems at the moment
  • GPS is being built into the some mobiles
    a tutorial on GPS
RFID
  • Radio Frequency Identification Tags
  • Not a mobile technology at all but a physical identification technology
  • Small passive low-cost antenna coils are imbedded in tags, labels or security fobs
  • Attached to cards (Oystercard), products (VirginMega), cars (Easypass) or pets (PetPassport)
  • Tags can be ready when passed through an antenna gate or touched to a reader
  • Tags can store serial number which can then be looked up in a database
  • Thousands of tags can be read per hour (even while the tag is moving)
    a good starting point for exploring the pros and cons of RFID

Recent comments:

On February 9, 2005 at 8:05 AM, Harminder Duhra wrote:

I would argue that RFID is a low cost technology. I have been exploring this technology since the summer... Walmart are making a big push to have its suppliers all RFID enabled otherwise they jeopardise their contracts. I have read recently in C Weekly that a lot of the courier services are not going to increase their usage on RFID as costs are still high. (DHL, Fed Ex)

I have seen the tags in action at the Enterprise Wireless Technology Exhibition (13-14 October 2004, Olympia). I was quite impressed with them i have to say.

Do you think one day RFID will kill the need for barcode?

On February 9, 2005 at 8:06 AM, Harminder Duhra wrote:

Also are we any nearer reaching international standards for the use of RFID?

On February 9, 2005 at 6:25 PM, Andy Stone wrote:

Interesting article on BBC News website about consumer concern over RFID tags. Even if some of the concerns are ill-founded, negative consumer perceptions could have an impact on the use of RFID in B2C markets.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4247275.stm

On February 12, 2005 at 6:06 PM, Nagz wrote:

I agree with you Jonathan and Harminder’s comment:- RFID is a low cost technology. But I DISAGREE courier services such as DHL, FED ex and high street stores such as M&S and TESCO etc are not taking up this technology, not because RFID costs are still high. The key to this argument is all about lessons learnt and past experiences. What’s happening is no company which has implemented RFID is willing to share its experience in this field, nor information on direct cost saving and implementation and roll out etc.... It’s like any business they do not want to give away their secrets especially while the raw technology is new. It's a big gamble for any company to try implement RFID.. Even with the use of RFID trial’s.......

On February 12, 2005 at 6:10 PM, Jonathan wrote:

I don't think RFID will kill barcodes completely because they are virtually free but the added benefits of RFID are very compelling and the tags and equipment are coming down in price.

There is no universal standard for RFID and as Nagz says there is reluctance to share knowledge. Oystercard clearly has had lots of teething problems but I think it is a success and the foundations for a very much improved ticketing and access system.

On February 13, 2005 at 4:59 PM, Harminder Duhra wrote:

Nagz, Jonathan thanks for your input... It is evident that no one is willing to share knowledge and this is why companies are not taking their use of RFID further at the present. With uncertainties project timescales fail to meet deadlines, costs rise further.

I guess until these uncertainties clear up we wont see as much use in small - medium scale businesses.

On February 14, 2005 at 9:43 AM, MightyMike wrote:

New wireless usb technology, pretty nifty:

http://deviceforge.com/articles/AT9015145687.html

On March 3, 2005 at 1:14 PM, justinjfloyd wrote:

test

On March 8, 2005 at 2:57 PM, J. Floyd wrote:

Can you recommend any websites that give advice on designing websites and the architecture behind them for mobile applications preferably concentrating on Internet Explorer for Windows SmartPhones - thanks

Jonathan replies: The Orange Developers site has some info on designing for the SPV.

On August 2, 2005 at 7:08 PM, Martin Felix wrote:

Greetings: Do you know of www.paperclick.com ? It's pretty awesome

www.paperclick.com

What do you think?







Add your comments