Although this site has been produced for specific courses and groups of students it is designed as a public resource. If you find it useful then please let me know.

If you want to comment feel free to do so and if you find something wrong get in touch.

hide alert

Feedback on mock short answer questions

Written by: Jonathan Briggs

January 12, 2006 [3279 views]

Thanks to the almost 50% of you who had a go at this week’s mock exam survey. I hope you will all find the following notes useful.

Choice of company

A good mix of companies and from the sampling I did they can all be improved although some more than others.

Identification of 3 faults

Some of you chose big faults – this was good. Others chose minute details such as the working of buttons – this was less good. Imagine you are a professional consultant going in to advise a customer – you identify the big problems: design, integration, marketing, customer journey and then use the small details to show what you mean.

Graphical and navigation problems

You will typically asked to identify a specific type of problem and most of you did. Identify clearly these specific problems. You will lose marks if you discuss other issues here. Imagine you are sitting in an interview with a client and someone asks you to describe how the graphics could be improved – you only talk about the graphics.

Linking changes in these specific areas to the faults you have identified

This is where you can begin to demonstrate your professionalism particularly if you have chosen BIG faults. Your faults may however need work in other areas and you should say so. Marks will be awarded for showing how you would deal with your faults while answering the question. Take time to study the question to see exactly what is being asked.

How many person days would it take to make these (graphical and navigation) changes?

Your answers were all over the place! Come on. Think about how long it would take YOU to do a good job. We had answers from 2 days to 1.5 years! I am not looking for exact figures but you need to set out the work involved and be realistic about the time involved. Keep in mind project management, integration, database work, graphical design, meetings. This is why the companies you have chosen need to be a realistic size. A typical project should be 50-150 days if you are going to make any significant improvements but you need to think about how this breaks down.

How does the site perform in web marketing?

I want evidence. I have given you some tools to help you measure how well the site is positioned in terms of reputation (PageRank) and traffic. Some of you really get this. Bland statements about how it seems OK will not get you all the marks.

What percentage improvement would you expect to see?

No company is going to invest significantly to achieve a 1% improvement. Once again you need to be realistic and consider the sort of investment that they are making. This is a very hard question but I would go out on a limb and look for a 50-100% improvement for any site that is very poor. Of course if the site is already very good it will be hard to make this sort of impact.

List 3 competitors

Any good consultant will have examined similar companies in the market and I was glad to see that you could do this.

Compare with competitors

Don’t be bland and tell me that your company is between its competitors and leave it at that. Once again generate evidence!

What lessons can be learned from the competitors?

Be careful in answering this. You are being asked what is better in the competitor site that could be copied and improved upon in your site. Once again be specific rather than general and provide evidence of the ways in which your competitor sites are better.

Blogging

Watch for the sting in the tail. This was not a trick question but a way of separating the good answers from the average. Some of you rose to the challenge and described the possible effects on customer service, reputation, company image etc. Others just ignored it.

Recent comments:

On January 12, 2006 at 8:20 PM, k0207658 wrote:

Could you please explain what you mean by 'blogging'.

Jonathan replies: Anyone doing a course in our department should be able to keep in touch with whats going on in the IT world. Where have you been? What ever happened to searching on Google?

On January 13, 2006 at 12:02 AM, M Hassan wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

I have noticed from the last survey (the one to help with second part of the exam) that most questions ask to list improvements.

My chosen client is a high street mens clothes retailer that does not do ecommerce online. Their website is just informational. So I am proposing a completely new ecommerce site. I feel that I will not be able to answer a lot of those questions effectively as I am redesigning the whole site. Do you advise to re do the whole thing for a client that needs improvement only? I don't want to be disadvantaged in the exam due to my choice of client. Thanks!

Jonathan replies: Adding ecommerce would be one (major) improvement but without thinking about the design, technology, integration, SEO, marketing etc the new store wont be fully effective.

On January 13, 2006 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan wrote:

HI Jonathan, for the question on "how many person days would it take to make changes to the site". does this mean myself only doing the work, or a team of 3 or 4 professionals?
thanks!

Jonathan replies: It should be the same. 3-4 professionals will be more expensive but faster, you will be slower but cheaper.

On January 13, 2006 at 1:47 PM, k0205995 wrote:

Great activity, hopefully an insight to questions on the paper but can you help with navigation/graphical techniques, my chosen site doesnt appear to have any problems but im sure it can be improved, were can i learn about techniques? Which lecture? i cnt find it!

Jonathan replies: We discussed quite a lot about navigation - helping people find the things they want, smoothing out the customer jouney, making things accessible to all users etc.

On design its about matching their offline brand or their competitors.

On January 13, 2006 at 6:52 PM, Ben Edwards wrote:

Hi jonathan, is it possible to post the answers of the mock MCQ because I only have a brief recollection of all the correct answers when using this to help my revision!

Jonathan replies: I'm afraid not. The point is to get you thinking rather than for you to memorise the answers. The questions are not the same but similar.

On January 13, 2006 at 11:14 PM, fadil alnassar wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

For the case study report, I am thinking that since it will be for my own use then I won't need to make it look fancy or organize it really well? Will that be ok?

Many Thanks

Jonathan replies: You should make it look presentatable so that the markers can see what you did. It does have to be handed in. Imagine the sort of notes you would take to a client presentation.

On January 14, 2006 at 6:37 PM, Ben Edwards wrote:

Hi Jonathan, last question I promise. In the mock paper their is a question on how plans could be altered if budget was increased. I know your company sets different budgets to repond to customers needs. Would you be asking in this question the changes to marketing aspects because I found it hard to justify implementation changes different to my initial budget. Can you just clarify what may be needed to answer this sort of question? Thank you.

Jonathan replies: Every we time I've been to a client pitch I am asked a "what if" question to see how robust my think is.

So what if we wanted to host it ourselves? So what if we wanted to integrate with an intranet? So what if we wanted to link to a SAP CRM system?

I think you can expect a small "what if" question that tests the sensitivity of your answers so far. Don't panic, just make sensible assumptions and show your thinking.

On January 16, 2006 at 1:32 PM, k0114362 wrote:

hi jonathan

the case study i took into yhe exam was very basic and mixed up as i had changed my case study at the lastminute and therefore i didn't have much to put in the case study.
will i be down marked?

Jonathan replies: You will be marked on the quality of your answers.

On January 16, 2006 at 3:19 PM, Rashid wrote:

i thought the exam was ok. tho some of the multiple questions were tricky! and one was about xHTML?? ??

Jonathan replies: Thanks for the feedback! It was supposed to separate good, average and poor students.

What do you think?







Add your comments